National Westminster Bank Plc v Waite & Anor

National Westminster Bank Plc v Waite & Anor

The guarantees were not procured by actual or presumed undue influence. The defendants exercised independent judgment, the bank followed standard procedures, and the guarantees were commercially explicable. The guarantees are enforceable.

Parties
Claimant: National Westminster Bank PLC; Defendant: Alan Philip Waite; Defendant: Linda Waite
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for claimant
Legal Topics
Personal Guarantees, Undue Influence, Suretyship, Enforceability of Guarantees
Contract Banking Equity Personal Guarantees Undue Influence Suretyship Enforceability of Guarantees

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Westminster Bank PLC

Claimant

Alan Philip Waite

Defendant

Linda Waite

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the guarantees given by the defendants were procured by undue influence and are unenforceable
  2. 2 Whether the bank followed appropriate procedures regarding independent legal advice
  3. 3 Whether the guarantees are enforceable given the circumstances of their execution

Ratio Decidendi

The guarantees were not procured by actual or presumed undue influence. The defendants exercised independent judgment, the bank followed standard procedures, and the guarantees were commercially explicable. The guarantees are enforceable.

Court Disposition

judgment for claimant

Orders

  • Guarantees are enforceable against the defendants
  • Judgment under both guarantees