Wiles, R. v

Wiles, R. v

The extended sentence imposed, aggregating the custodial and extension periods, constituted a qualifying sentence under section 28, making the disqualification order lawful and required; the extension period was justified and not manifestly excessive given the appellant's risk profile and lack of insight.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Alan Ralph Wiles
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Indecent Assault, Possession of Indecent Images, Extended Sentence, Disqualification From Working With Children, Sex Offenders Register
Criminal Law Indecent Assault Possession of Indecent Images Extended Sentence Disqualification From Working With Children Sex Offenders Register

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Alan Ralph Wiles

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the order under section 28 of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 was lawful given the custodial term imposed
  2. 2 Whether the extension period of 18 months was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The extended sentence imposed, aggregating the custodial and extension periods, constituted a qualifying sentence under section 28, making the disqualification order lawful and required; the extension period was justified and not manifestly excessive given the appellant's risk profile and lack of insight.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Section 28 order upheld
  • Extension period of 18 months upheld