Donnellan v Ward & Ors [2024] EWHC 2304 (Ch) (06 September 2024)
The late disclosure by the Ward Parties, Mrs Ward and Ms Dorobat did not make a fair trial impossible or prevent the court from doing justice. The documents disclosed late were not of such significance as to warrant striking out the Defences. The Donnellan Parties had knowledge of the relevant issues and could have sought disclosure earlier. The application to strike out is dismissed; the case proceeds to determination on the merits.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 2304 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Anthony Donnellan; Defendant: Alan Ward; Defendant: Luxap Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Ebonair Investment SA; Defendant: Maureen Helen Ward; Defendant: Gabriela Elena Dorobat; Third Party/claimant/part 20 Defendant: Ricky Alan Keane; Fourth Party: Ian Wilton Keen; Fifth Party: Bobi Howard; Defendant: Chelsea Bridge Apartments Limited; Defendant: Persons Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (chancery Division) Multi Party Consolidated Proceedings / Post Trial Judgment on Strike Out Application and Substantive Trial Issues
- Outcome
- Strike out application dismissed; proceedings to be determined on the merits.
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Applications, Disclosure Obligations, Beneficial Ownership, Nominee Arrangements, Partnership Existence, Possession Proceedings, Enforcement of Arbitration Awards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Donnellan
Claimant
Alan Ward
Defendant
Luxap Limited
Defendant
Ebonair Investment SA
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Maureen Helen Ward
Defendant
Gabriela Elena Dorobat
Defendant
Ricky Alan Keane
Third Party/claimant/part 20 Defendant
Ian Wilton Keen
Fourth Party
Bobi Howard
Fifth Party
Chelsea Bridge Apartments Limited
Defendant
Persons Unknown
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (chancery Division) Multi Party Consolidated Proceedings / Post Trial Judgment on Strike Out Application and Substantive Trial Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defences of Mr Ward, Mrs Ward and Ms Dorobat should be struck out for disclosure failures
- 2 Whether a partnership existed between Mr Donnellan and Mr Ward
- 3 Who holds the beneficial interest in certain flats (partnership, Ebonair, or nominees)
Ratio Decidendi
The late disclosure by the Ward Parties, Mrs Ward and Ms Dorobat did not make a fair trial impossible or prevent the court from doing justice. The documents disclosed late were not of such significance as to warrant striking out the Defences. The Donnellan Parties had knowledge of the relevant issues and could have sought disclosure earlier. The application to strike out is dismissed; the case proceeds to determination on the merits.
Court Disposition
Strike out application dismissed; proceedings to be determined on the merits.
Orders
- The Defences of Mr Ward, Mrs Ward and Ms Dorobat are not struck out.
- The trial continues to determination of substantive issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment