EQ Projects v Alavi [2006] EWHC 29 (TCC) (06 January 2006)
Defendant is the successful party as claimant failed to beat pre-action offer and payments into court, and defendant succeeded on key issues. Claimant to pay defendant's costs, with indemnity basis applying from 28 November 2005 onwards due to claimant's unreasonable conduct in maintaining a hopeless case.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 29 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: E. Q. Projects; Defendant: Alavi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Costs Ruling
- Outcome
- Claimant to pay defendant's costs; indemnity basis from 28 November 2005 onwards.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Payments Into Court, Pre Action Offers, Contract Disputes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E. Q. Projects
Claimant
Alavi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Costs Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is the successful party for costs purposes?
- 2 Should costs be assessed on an indemnity basis?
- 3 Effect of pre-action offers and payments into court on costs liability
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant is the successful party as claimant failed to beat pre-action offer and payments into court, and defendant succeeded on key issues. Claimant to pay defendant's costs, with indemnity basis applying from 28 November 2005 onwards due to claimant's unreasonable conduct in maintaining a hopeless case.
Court Disposition
Claimant to pay defendant's costs; indemnity basis from 28 November 2005 onwards.
Orders
- Claimant to pay defendant's costs up to 28 November 2005 on standard basis.
- Claimant to pay defendant's costs from 28 November 2005 onwards on indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment