Hill, R. v

Hill, R. v

The conviction on count 3 was quashed as the Crown Court had no jurisdiction over a summary only offence. The appeal against the destruction order was dismissed because, despite the judge's failure to consider a contingent destruction order, there was no evidence that such an order would ensure public safety. Immediate destruction was unavoidable.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Albert James Hill
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction on count 3 allowed; conviction quashed. Appeal against destruction order dismissed.
Legal Topics
Dangerous Dogs, Destruction Orders, Summary Offences, Jurisdiction, Sentencing
Criminal Law Animal Law Dangerous Dogs Destruction Orders Summary Offences Jurisdiction Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Albert James Hill

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Crown Court had jurisdiction to convict on count 3, a summary only offence
  2. 2 Whether the destruction order for the dog was mandatory or if a contingent destruction order should have been considered

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction on count 3 was quashed as the Crown Court had no jurisdiction over a summary only offence. The appeal against the destruction order was dismissed because, despite the judge's failure to consider a contingent destruction order, there was no evidence that such an order would ensure public safety. Immediate destruction was unavoidable.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction on count 3 allowed; conviction quashed. Appeal against destruction order dismissed.

Orders

  • Conviction on count 3 quashed
  • Immediate destruction order for the dog affirmed