Whiting v Halverson & Ors [2002] EWCA Civ 1858 (8 October 2002)
Permission to appeal was granted because the first instance decision was made on an erroneous basis and there are arguable points regarding the exclusivity of arbitration/appeal remedies and whether the arbitration agreement was rescinded by conduct.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1858
- Parties
- Applicant: Albert Whiting; Defendant: William Halverson; Defendant: Edmund Hall; Defendant: Jill Prendergast; Defendant: Alan Gillis (and others)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Agreements, Stay of Proceedings, Club Membership Termination, Interpretation of Club Constitutions, Rescission by Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert Whiting
Applicant
William Halverson
Defendant
Edmund Hall
Defendant
Jill Prendergast
Defendant
Alan Gillis (and others)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the club constitution provides exclusive remedies (arbitration or appeal) for challenging termination of membership
- 2 Whether the arbitration agreement was rescinded by conduct or mutual agreement
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal was granted because the first instance decision was made on an erroneous basis and there are arguable points regarding the exclusivity of arbitration/appeal remedies and whether the arbitration agreement was rescinded by conduct.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Costs to be costs in the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment