Whiting v Halverson & Ors [2003] EWCA Civ 403 (06 March 2003)
A member who elects to arbitrate under a club constitution is bound by that election and cannot unilaterally withdraw from arbitration to pursue court proceedings; the constitution and Arbitration Act 1996 require a stay of proceedings in such circumstances.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 403
- Parties
- Appellant: Albert Whiting; Respondent: William Halverson; Respondent: Edmund Hall; Respondent: Jill Prendergast; Respondent: Alan Gillis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From County Court Order Staying Proceedings Under Arbitration Act 1996
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Agreements, Stay of Proceedings, Interpretation of Club Constitutions, Jurisdiction of Club Councils, Withdrawal From Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert Whiting
Appellant
William Halverson
Respondent
Edmund Hall
Respondent
Jill Prendergast
Respondent
Alan Gillis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From County Court Order Staying Proceedings Under Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article XI of the club constitution precluded court proceedings in respect of termination of membership
- 2 Whether there was an effective withdrawal from the arbitration reference
Ratio Decidendi
A member who elects to arbitrate under a club constitution is bound by that election and cannot unilaterally withdraw from arbitration to pursue court proceedings; the constitution and Arbitration Act 1996 require a stay of proceedings in such circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Costs to be assessed by a costs judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment