R v Albjon Axhami

R v Albjon Axhami

The sentencing judge was entitled to find no evidence of lack of maturity or exploitation, correctly categorised the appellant's role, and properly balanced aggravating and mitigating factors; the sentence was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Albjon Axhami
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 December 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Production of Controlled Drugs, Youth and Maturity in Sentencing, Role Categorisation in Drug Offences
Criminal Law Sentencing Production of Controlled Drugs Youth and Maturity in Sentencing Role Categorisation in Drug Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Albjon Axhami

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient discount for the appellant's youth and immaturity
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was correctly categorised as having a significant role under sentencing guidelines
  3. 3 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was entitled to find no evidence of lack of maturity or exploitation, correctly categorised the appellant's role, and properly balanced aggravating and mitigating factors; the sentence was not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of two years eight months' imprisonment altered to detention in a young offender institution
  • Appeal against sentence dismissed