Aldi Stores Ltd v WSP Group Plc & Ors

Aldi Stores Ltd v WSP Group Plc & Ors

Aldi's conduct in not bringing the claims against WSP and Aspinwall in the original action was not an abuse of process. The absence of identity between the defendants, the commercial reasonableness of Aldi's litigation strategy, the lack of culpability or impropriety, and the transparency of Aldi's intentions all weighed against a finding of abuse. The respondents failed to demonstrate unjust harassment or oppression, and the judge at first instance erred by not properly weighing these factors. The appeal was allowed and the strike out application dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Aldi Stores Limited; First Respondent: WSP Group plc; Second Respondent: WSP London Limited; Third Respondent: Aspinwall & Company Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Striking Out Claim for Abuse of Process
Outcome
Appeal allowed; application to strike out dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Strike Out Applications, Case Management, Finality in Litigation, Multi Party Litigation
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Professional Negligence Abuse of Process Strike Out Applications Case Management Finality in Litigation Multi Party Litigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aldi Stores Limited

Appellant

WSP Group plc

First Respondent

WSP London Limited

Second Respondent

Aspinwall & Company Limited

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Striking Out Claim for Abuse of Process

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Aldi's claim against WSP and Aspinwall was an abuse of process for not being brought in earlier proceedings
  2. 2 Whether the absence of identity between defendants in the original and subsequent actions bars an abuse of process application
  3. 3 Whether settlement of the original action (rather than judgment) affects the abuse of process analysis

Ratio Decidendi

Aldi's conduct in not bringing the claims against WSP and Aspinwall in the original action was not an abuse of process. The absence of identity between the defendants, the commercial reasonableness of Aldi's litigation strategy, the lack of culpability or impropriety, and the transparency of Aldi's intentions all weighed against a finding of abuse. The respondents failed to demonstrate unjust harassment or oppression, and the judge at first instance erred by not properly weighing these factors. The appeal was allowed and the strike out application dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; application to strike out dismissed

Orders

  • Strike out application by WSP and Aspinwall dismissed
  • Matter to proceed to case management conference for further directions