Iceland Foods Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd (Rev 1)

Iceland Foods Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd (Rev 1)

The lease does not, on its true construction or by implication, prohibit Aldi from extending the footprint of its building. The references to the 'blue land' merely identify the unit and do not restrict future extension. The lease is commercially coherent without the implied term, and any actionable interference with Iceland's rights can be addressed directly.

Parties
Claimant: Iceland Foods Limited; Defendant: Aldi Stores Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Summary Judgment Application; Final Determination of Principal Issue
Outcome
Claim dismissed; summary judgment for defendant on principal issue
Legal Topics
Construction of Lease, Implied Terms, Restrictive Covenants, Rights of Way, Car Parking Rights
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Construction of Lease Implied Terms Restrictive Covenants Rights of Way Car Parking Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iceland Foods Limited

Claimant

Aldi Stores Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Summary Judgment Application; Final Determination of Principal Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the lease prohibits Aldi from extending the footprint of its building by construction or implication
  2. 2 Whether a term should be implied into the lease restricting Aldi from increasing the footprint of its unit

Ratio Decidendi

The lease does not, on its true construction or by implication, prohibit Aldi from extending the footprint of its building. The references to the 'blue land' merely identify the unit and do not restrict future extension. The lease is commercially coherent without the implied term, and any actionable interference with Iceland's rights can be addressed directly.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; summary judgment for defendant on principal issue