Butt, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1277 (30 July 2021)
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and properly reflected the criminal conduct, including premeditation, use of weapons, and the sustained nature of the attack. The judge did not err in categorising the offence or in the weight given to aggravating and mitigating factors.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Crim 1277
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Alec Butt
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Appeal Against Sentence, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Alec Butt
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the offence as Category 2 with greater culpability and lesser harm
- 2 Whether the victim was wrongly found to be vulnerable
- 3 Whether the appellant exploited contact arrangements with children
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive and properly reflected the criminal conduct, including premeditation, use of weapons, and the sustained nature of the attack. The judge did not err in categorising the offence or in the weight given to aggravating and mitigating factors.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Sentence of 7 years and 9 months' imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment