R v Alex Davies

R v Alex Davies

The custodial term imposed was manifestly excessive given the statutory maximum, the guideline range, the appellant's role during the indictment period, and the significant mitigating factors including delay, age, lack of previous convictions, and health decline. A greater reduction from the provisional sentence was required.

Parties
Appellant: Alex Davies; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed; sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Membership of Proscribed Organisation, Sentencing, Mitigation, Dangerousness
Criminal Law Counter Terrorism Membership of Proscribed Organisation Sentencing Mitigation Dangerousness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alex Davies

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate placement within the sentencing guideline range
  3. 3 Sufficiency of reduction for mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The custodial term imposed was manifestly excessive given the statutory maximum, the guideline range, the appellant's role during the indictment period, and the significant mitigating factors including delay, age, lack of previous convictions, and health decline. A greater reduction from the provisional sentence was required.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; sentence reduced

Orders

  • Special custodial sentence of nine years six months quashed
  • Substituted special custodial sentence of eight years: seven years' custody and one year extended licence