R v Alex Melaku
The Judge gave proper and express consideration to the applicant's age, immaturity, and personal circumstances. The disparity in minimum terms between the applicant and his adult co-accused fairly reflected age differences. The sentence imposed was appropriate given the seriousness of the offences and the applicant's involvement.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Alex Melaku
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Murder, Conspiracy to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Youth Offenders, Minimum Term Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Alex Melaku
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's age and immaturity were properly reflected in the minimum term imposed for murder and conspiracy to cause grievous bodily harm
Ratio Decidendi
The Judge gave proper and express consideration to the applicant's age, immaturity, and personal circumstances. The disparity in minimum terms between the applicant and his adult co-accused fairly reflected age differences. The sentence imposed was appropriate given the seriousness of the offences and the applicant's involvement.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Orders
- Extension of time to renew application granted
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment