Baturina v Chistyakov

Baturina v Chistyakov

Mr Chistyakov breached clause 3 of the PPA by failing to provide a 35% contribution to project funding, but Ms Baturina failed to prove recoverable loss or causation. No actionable deceit or breach of fiduciary duty was established. The supplemental agreement did not terminate the initial loans or preclude claims. Claims for damages failed due to lack of factual causation and quantum.

Parties
Claimant: Elena Baturina; Defendant: Alexander Chistyakov
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim for breach of contract succeeds in part; claims for deceit and fiduciary duty fail; no substantive damages awarded.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Deceit, Fiduciary Duty, Joint Venture, Reflective Loss, Damages, Implied Terms, Contract Construction
Contract Law Tort Law Equity Breach of Contract Deceit Fiduciary Duty Joint Venture Reflective Loss +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elena Baturina

Claimant

Alexander Chistyakov

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Dispute / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Chistyakov breached the PPA by failing to contribute 35% funding
  2. 2 Whether Mr Chistyakov owed and breached fiduciary duties to Ms Baturina
  3. 3 Whether Mr Chistyakov made actionable misrepresentations amounting to deceit

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Chistyakov breached clause 3 of the PPA by failing to provide a 35% contribution to project funding, but Ms Baturina failed to prove recoverable loss or causation. No actionable deceit or breach of fiduciary duty was established. The supplemental agreement did not terminate the initial loans or preclude claims. Claims for damages failed due to lack of factual causation and quantum.

Court Disposition

Claim for breach of contract succeeds in part; claims for deceit and fiduciary duty fail; no substantive damages awarded.

Orders

  • Claim in deceit dismissed
  • Claim for breach of fiduciary duty dismissed