Ramsay, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 64 (20 January 2023)
The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offence as category 2A with a leading role in group activity, and the upward adjustment to 16 years was not manifestly excessive. The failure to impose mandatory minimum sentences on counts 3 and 4 was corrected by imposing concurrent 5-year sentences, which did not increase the overall sentence.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 64
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Alexander Ramsay
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; sentence adjusted to impose mandatory minimums on counts 3 and 4, concurrent with principal sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Appeals, Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Alexander Ramsay
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorisation under the Sentencing Guidelines
- 3 Whether the judge was correct to impose no separate penalty for counts requiring mandatory minimum sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to categorise the offence as category 2A with a leading role in group activity, and the upward adjustment to 16 years was not manifestly excessive. The failure to impose mandatory minimum sentences on counts 3 and 4 was corrected by imposing concurrent 5-year sentences, which did not increase the overall sentence.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused; sentence adjusted to impose mandatory minimums on counts 3 and 4, concurrent with principal sentence.
Orders
- Impose 5-year concurrent sentences on counts 3 and 4 for mandatory minimums under the Firearms Act 1968.
- Applicant remains subject to 16 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment