Andrews, R v
The applicant's conviction was safe because he pleaded guilty after receiving legal advice, and none of the grounds raised are arguable or supported by evidence.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Alexander Stephen Andrews
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Dogs, Extension of Time, Appeal Against Conviction, Guilty Plea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Alexander Stephen Andrews
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's conviction following a guilty plea was safe
- 2 Whether grounds exist for extension of time to appeal conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's conviction was safe because he pleaded guilty after receiving legal advice, and none of the grounds raised are arguable or supported by evidence.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment