R v Alexander Thomas Windsor

R v Alexander Thomas Windsor

The trial judge was entitled to admit the previous conviction as it was relevant to whether the applicant was a participant or a dupe, and it demonstrated a propensity to commit similar offences, even considering the time elapsed and difference in roles.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Alexander Thomas Windsor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Legal Topics
Bad Character Evidence, Conspiracy to Cheat Revenue, Evasion of Duty, VAT Fraud
Criminal Law Bad Character Evidence Conspiracy to Cheat Revenue Evasion of Duty VAT Fraud

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Alexander Thomas Windsor

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the admission of previous conviction as bad character evidence was proper
  2. 2 Whether the previous conviction demonstrated a propensity to commit the offences charged
  3. 3 Whether the admission of such evidence rendered the proceedings unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was entitled to admit the previous conviction as it was relevant to whether the applicant was a participant or a dupe, and it demonstrated a propensity to commit similar offences, even considering the time elapsed and difference in roles.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused