Chaston & Anor v Chaston

Chaston & Anor v Chaston

The district judge properly exercised discretion under section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 to direct sale of the property to the respondent at a value determined by valuation, taking into account all relevant factors including the wishes of beneficiaries, the intentions of the trust creators, and the agreement in principle. No error of law, procedural unfairness, or misapplication of legal principles was established.

Parties
Appellant: Alfred Christopher John Chaston; Appellant: Judith Ann Arnold; Respondent: Robert Anthony Chaston
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Trusts of Land, Appointment of Trustees, Sale of Trust Property, Exercise of Judicial Discretion, Beneficiaries' Rights
Trusts Law Property Law Trusts of Land Appointment of Trustees Sale of Trust Property Exercise of Judicial Discretion Beneficiaries' Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfred Christopher John Chaston

Appellant

Judith Ann Arnold

Appellant

Robert Anthony Chaston

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court had power under section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 to direct sale of trust property to one beneficiary rather than open market sale
  2. 2 Whether the district judge erred in taking into account an agreement in principle among beneficiaries for sale to the respondent
  3. 3 Whether the wishes of beneficiaries and intentions of trust creators were properly considered

Ratio Decidendi

The district judge properly exercised discretion under section 14 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 to direct sale of the property to the respondent at a value determined by valuation, taking into account all relevant factors including the wishes of beneficiaries, the intentions of the trust creators, and the agreement in principle. No error of law, procedural unfairness, or misapplication of legal principles was established.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The order of the district judge stands: the property is to be sold to the respondent at a value determined by valuation.