Khalid, R.

Khalid, R.

The judge erred by increasing the sentence based on prevalence without following required procedure or evidential basis, resulting in an unfair approach. The custody threshold was passed, but mitigation warranted a reduced sentence.

Parties
Appellant: Ali Khalid; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Dangerous Driving, Sentencing, Prevalence as Aggravating Factor, Driving Without Insurance
Criminal Law Dangerous Driving Sentencing Prevalence as Aggravating Factor Driving Without Insurance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Khalid

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether prevalence of offending was properly considered as an aggravating factor
  3. 3 Whether proper procedure was followed in considering prevalence

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred by increasing the sentence based on prevalence without following required procedure or evidential basis, resulting in an unfair approach. The custody threshold was passed, but mitigation warranted a reduced sentence.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence of 6 months' detention quashed and replaced with 4 months' detention.
  • Disqualification from driving varied to 14 months and to continue until passing an extended driving test.