Shabani, Re
The appellant was not properly advised of a defence available to him under section 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 and the Refugee Convention, and would have had a reasonable prospect of success; therefore, the conviction must be quashed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ali Shabani; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Possession of False Identity Documents, Defence Under Refugee Convention, Section 31 Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, Competence of Legal Advisers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali Shabani
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Following Reference by Criminal Cases Review Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a viable defence under section 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 and the Refugee Convention
- 2 Whether the appellant was properly advised regarding his legal defence
- 3 Whether time spent in Spain constituted a break in flight under section 31(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not properly advised of a defence available to him under section 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 and the Refugee Convention, and would have had a reasonable prospect of success; therefore, the conviction must be quashed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Referral of duty solicitor and solicitor to Solicitors Regulatory Authority for investigation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment