Tas v R. (joint enterprise)

Tas v R. (joint enterprise)

The trial judge was correct not to direct the jury on the possibility of an overwhelming supervening event because, on the evidence, the use of the knife was not an act that nobody in the defendant’s shoes could have contemplated. The law does not require knowledge of the weapon for manslaughter liability in joint enterprise, and the jury was properly directed on the issues of participation and intent.

Parties
Appellant: Ali Tas; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Joint Enterprise, Manslaughter, Murder, Supervening Event, Intention, Knowledge of Weapon

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Tas

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to direct the jury on the possibility of an overwhelming supervening event negating liability for manslaughter where the appellant did not know a co-defendant would use a knife
  2. 2 Whether knowledge of a weapon is required for manslaughter liability in joint enterprise cases

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge was correct not to direct the jury on the possibility of an overwhelming supervening event because, on the evidence, the use of the knife was not an act that nobody in the defendant’s shoes could have contemplated. The law does not require knowledge of the weapon for manslaughter liability in joint enterprise, and the jury was properly directed on the issues of participation and intent.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed