Tas v R. (joint enterprise)
The trial judge was correct not to direct the jury on the possibility of an overwhelming supervening event because, on the evidence, the use of the knife was not an act that nobody in the defendant’s shoes could have contemplated. The law does not require knowledge of the weapon for manslaughter liability in joint enterprise, and the jury was properly directed on the issues of participation and intent.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ali Tas; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Joint Enterprise, Manslaughter, Murder, Supervening Event, Intention, Knowledge of Weapon
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali Tas
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to direct the jury on the possibility of an overwhelming supervening event negating liability for manslaughter where the appellant did not know a co-defendant would use a knife
- 2 Whether knowledge of a weapon is required for manslaughter liability in joint enterprise cases
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was correct not to direct the jury on the possibility of an overwhelming supervening event because, on the evidence, the use of the knife was not an act that nobody in the defendant’s shoes could have contemplated. The law does not require knowledge of the weapon for manslaughter liability in joint enterprise, and the jury was properly directed on the issues of participation and intent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment