Ali v Stagecoach
A letter making an interim payment, reserving rights to recover any overpayment, is not equivalent to an offer capable of acceptance for the purposes of costs. The judge erred in treating it as such and giving it excessive weight in the costs decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ali; Respondent: Stagecoach
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment on Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Interim Payments, Low Velocity Impact, Offers to Settle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali
Appellant
Stagecoach
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim payment letter is equivalent to an offer for costs purposes
- 2 Proper exercise of discretion in awarding costs where the claimant recovers less than an interim payment
Ratio Decidendi
A letter making an interim payment, reserving rights to recover any overpayment, is not equivalent to an offer capable of acceptance for the purposes of costs. The judge erred in treating it as such and giving it excessive weight in the costs decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- No order as to the costs of the trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment