Murphy, R v [2019] EWCA Crim 1274 (27 June 2019)
The fresh evidence provided by Anthony Murphy was not capable of belief and did not undermine the safety of the conviction; the sentence imposed was within the appropriate range and not manifestly excessive.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Crim 1274
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Alison Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Fresh Evidence, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Alison Murphy
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence undermines the safety of the conviction for attempted murder
- 2 Whether the sentence of seventeen years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The fresh evidence provided by Anthony Murphy was not capable of belief and did not undermine the safety of the conviction; the sentence imposed was within the appropriate range and not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
applications refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment