Mahim Khan v Alkiviades David
The defendant was properly served, knew and understood the requirements of the freezing orders, had the ability to comply, deliberately failed to comply, and provided no acceptable explanation; contempt is established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mahim Khan; Defendant: Alkiviades David
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt and Adjournment for Committal Hearing
- Outcome
- Contempt established; matter adjourned for committal hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Service of Process, Affidavit Requirements, Disability Accommodations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahim Khan
Claimant
Alkiviades David
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt and Adjournment for Committal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was properly served with the contempt application
- 2 Whether the defendant complied with paragraphs 9 and 10 of the First and Second Freezing Orders
- 3 Whether the defendant's failure to comply was deliberate and without acceptable explanation
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was properly served, knew and understood the requirements of the freezing orders, had the ability to comply, deliberately failed to comply, and provided no acceptable explanation; contempt is established.
Court Disposition
Contempt established; matter adjourned for committal hearing.
Orders
- Matter adjourned for committal hearing.
- Defendant found in contempt for failure to comply with paragraphs 9 and 10 of the First and Second Freezing Orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment