Khan v David [2025] EWHC 3041 (KB) (16 October 2025)
The defendant was properly served with the relevant orders and contempt application, was fully aware of their contents and requirements, had the ability to comply, and deliberately failed to do so without acceptable explanation, amounting to contempt of court.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 3041 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mahim Khan; Defendant: Alkiviades David
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application (civil Enforcement) / Post Judgment, Pre Committal Hearing
- Outcome
- Finding of contempt; matter adjourned for committal hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Personal Service, Affidavit Requirements, Disability Accommodations, Compliance With Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahim Khan
Claimant
Alkiviades David
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application (civil Enforcement) / Post Judgment, Pre Committal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was properly served with the contempt application and freezing orders
- 2 Whether the defendant deliberately failed to comply with paragraphs 9 and 10 of the First and Second Freezing Orders
- 3 Whether the defendant had the ability to comply with the orders
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was properly served with the relevant orders and contempt application, was fully aware of their contents and requirements, had the ability to comply, and deliberately failed to do so without acceptable explanation, amounting to contempt of court.
Court Disposition
Finding of contempt; matter adjourned for committal hearing.
Orders
- The matter is adjourned for a committal hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment