R v Allen
Although there was no good reason for the delay, the case presented an exceptional circumstance: the Determining Officer excluded all electronic evidence from the PPE count despite its central importance and relevant legal authorities. This justified granting an extension of time for the appeal.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Allen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Costs Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Under Regulation 31 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Legal Aid Remuneration, Pages of Prosecution Evidence (ppe), Electronic Evidence, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Allen
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Costs Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Under Regulation 31 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time to file an appeal against the Determining Officer's decision should be granted under Regulation 31 of the 2013 Regulations
- 2 Whether there are good reasons or exceptional circumstances justifying the extension
Ratio Decidendi
Although there was no good reason for the delay, the case presented an exceptional circumstance: the Determining Officer excluded all electronic evidence from the PPE count despite its central importance and relevant legal authorities. This justified granting an extension of time for the appeal.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted
Orders
- The appeal is listed for a full hearing with appropriate directions to follow.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment