The Metropolitan Borough Council of Sefton v Allenbuild Limited
The enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision does not fall within the scope of the arbitration clause in the contract, and the defendant, having participated in the adjudication without raising jurisdictional objections or reserving its position, has waived any such objections. There is no real prospect of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Metropolitan Borough Council of Sefton; Defendant: Allenbuild Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Construction Contract Adjudication Enforcement / Application for Summary Judgment and Cross Application for Stay Pending Arbitration
- Outcome
- Defendant’s application for stay refused; claimant’s application for summary judgment granted.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Summary Judgment, Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreement, Jurisdictional Objections, Waiver, Interpretation of Construction Contracts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Metropolitan Borough Council of Sefton
Claimant
Allenbuild Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction Contract Adjudication Enforcement / Application for Summary Judgment and Cross Application for Stay Pending Arbitration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment should be granted to enforce an adjudicator’s decision under a construction contract
- 2 Whether proceedings should be stayed under s.9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 for arbitration
- 3 Whether the arbitration clause covers enforcement of adjudicator’s decisions
Ratio Decidendi
The enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision does not fall within the scope of the arbitration clause in the contract, and the defendant, having participated in the adjudication without raising jurisdictional objections or reserving its position, has waived any such objections. There is no real prospect of the defendant successfully defending the claim, and no compelling reason for a trial. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted and the application for a stay is refused.
Court Disposition
Defendant’s application for stay refused; claimant’s application for summary judgment granted.
Orders
- Defendant to pay claimant £2,204,217.13 plus interest at £51.92 per day from 24 January 2022 until payment.
- Costs to follow the event; defendant to pay claimant’s costs of both applications and the claim as a whole.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment