Various Eateries Trading Ltd v Allianz Insurance Plc [2022] EWHC 2549 (Comm) (17 October 2022)
The Court held that each case of COVID-19 in the vicinity constituted a separate Covered Event under the Disease Clause, and that the Indemnity Period begins with the interruption or interference with business, not the occurrence of the Covered Event. Losses after the Period of Insurance are only recoverable if proximately caused by Covered Events within the Period of Insurance. The applicable limits of liability are those specified for each clause, not the higher 'Total Value' figures. Aggregation of losses depends on the specific connection to a single occurrence as defined in the policy.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2549 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Various Eateries Trading Limited; Defendant: Allianz Insurance PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Claim (business Interruption) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined in favour of both parties in part; detailed findings on policy construction, causation, limits, and aggregation; further submissions invited on certain factual applications.
- Legal Topics
- Business Interruption Insurance, Policy Interpretation, COVID 19 Pandemic Losses, Aggregation of Claims, Causation, Limits of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Various Eateries Trading Limited
Claimant
Allianz Insurance PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Claim (business Interruption) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes a 'Covered Event' under the Disease, Prevention of Access, and Enforced Closure Clauses?
- 2 How is the Indemnity Period to be calculated and when does it begin?
- 3 Are losses after the Period of Insurance but within the Maximum Indemnity Period recoverable?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that each case of COVID-19 in the vicinity constituted a separate Covered Event under the Disease Clause, and that the Indemnity Period begins with the interruption or interference with business, not the occurrence of the Covered Event. Losses after the Period of Insurance are only recoverable if proximately caused by Covered Events within the Period of Insurance. The applicable limits of liability are those specified for each clause, not the higher 'Total Value' figures. Aggregation of losses depends on the specific connection to a single occurrence as defined in the policy.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined in favour of both parties in part; detailed findings on policy construction, causation, limits, and aggregation; further submissions invited on certain factual applications.
Orders
- Declaration as to the meaning of 'Covered Event' under each clause.
- Declaration as to the commencement of the Indemnity Period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment