Alliott v Cheeld (Blacksmith) [2013] EWCA Civ 508 (11 April 2013)
Defects in workmanship amounted to breach of condition, not mere warranty, entitling appellants to reject the porch and recover sums paid. The nature and extent of defects, cost of rectification, and contractual expectations justified treating the breach as a condition. Affirmation and loss of right to reject were not established on the facts.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 508
- Parties
- Appellant: Alliott; Respondent: Stephen Cheeld (Blacksmith)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Second Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Sale of Goods, Supply of Goods and Services, Right to Reject, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alliott
Appellant
Stephen Cheeld (Blacksmith)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Second Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defects in workmanship amounted to breach of condition or warranty
- 2 Whether appellants retained right to reject goods after acceptance
- 3 Appropriate assessment of damages for defective workmanship
Ratio Decidendi
Defects in workmanship amounted to breach of condition, not mere warranty, entitling appellants to reject the porch and recover sums paid. The nature and extent of defects, cost of rectification, and contractual expectations justified treating the breach as a condition. Affirmation and loss of right to reject were not established on the facts.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Circuit Judge's order for further evidence set aside
- District Judge's judgment set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment