Beard v General Osteopathic Council
The decision of the Professional Conduct Committee was unjust due to a serious procedural irregularity, namely, unfair and hostile questioning by Ms Neville which compromised the fairness of the proceedings and impaired the committee’s ability to evaluate evidence objectively. The irregularity was serious enough to warrant setting aside the decision and the conditions of practice order.
- Parties
- Appellant: Allison Beard; Respondent: General Osteopathic Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; committee decision and conditions of practice order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Apparent Bias, Unacceptable Professional Conduct, Recusal of Tribunal Members
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allison Beard
Appellant
General Osteopathic Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether questioning by tribunal members rendered the proceedings unfair
- 2 Whether the decision was unjust due to serious procedural or other irregularity
- 3 Whether recusal of tribunal members was warranted
Ratio Decidendi
The decision of the Professional Conduct Committee was unjust due to a serious procedural irregularity, namely, unfair and hostile questioning by Ms Neville which compromised the fairness of the proceedings and impaired the committee’s ability to evaluate evidence objectively. The irregularity was serious enough to warrant setting aside the decision and the conditions of practice order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; committee decision and conditions of practice order set aside.
Orders
- The decision of the Professional Conduct Committee is set aside.
- The 12 month conditions of practice order is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment