R v Alomgir Kabir

R v Alomgir Kabir

No unequivocal indication of a guilty plea was given at the first stage of proceedings; therefore, the appellant was not entitled to the maximum one-third reduction in sentence. The provisional sentence before mitigation was justified given the seriousness and persistence of the offending.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Alomgir Kabir
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Guilty Plea Reduction, Controlling or Coercive Behaviour, Domestic Violence
Criminal Law Sentencing Guilty Plea Reduction Controlling or Coercive Behaviour Domestic Violence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Alomgir Kabir

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to the maximum one-third reduction in sentence for a guilty plea under the Sentencing Council’s Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Guideline
  2. 2 Whether the provisional sentence before mitigation was excessive

Ratio Decidendi

No unequivocal indication of a guilty plea was given at the first stage of proceedings; therefore, the appellant was not entitled to the maximum one-third reduction in sentence. The provisional sentence before mitigation was justified given the seriousness and persistence of the offending.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against sentence dismissed
  • Statutory surcharge ordered