Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft v Alpha Trains (UK) Ltd.

Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft v Alpha Trains (UK) Ltd.

The 2009 Guarantee is not a demand bond; VAG's liability is triggered only upon proof of breach or failure of performance by a Guaranteed Party under a Relevant Document, not by mere demand. The presumption against demand bonds in non-banking contexts is not rebutted by the wording or context of the instrument.

Parties
Claimant: Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft; Defendant: Alpha Trains (UK) Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Declaration granted that the 2009 Guarantee is not a demand bond; VAG's liability is not triggered by demand alone.
Legal Topics
Guarantees, Indemnities, Performance Bonds, Interpretation of Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft

Claimant

Alpha Trains (UK) Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 2009 Guarantee is a demand bond or a guarantee/indemnity requiring proof of breach before payment obligation arises
  2. 2 Construction of the 2009 Guarantee instrument

Ratio Decidendi

The 2009 Guarantee is not a demand bond; VAG's liability is triggered only upon proof of breach or failure of performance by a Guaranteed Party under a Relevant Document, not by mere demand. The presumption against demand bonds in non-banking contexts is not rebutted by the wording or context of the instrument.

Court Disposition

Declaration granted that the 2009 Guarantee is not a demand bond; VAG's liability is not triggered by demand alone.

Orders

  • Declaration as sought by VAG granted.
  • Alternative claim for €2,487,544 deferred pending outcome of related proceedings in Technology and Construction Court.