The English Electric Company Ltd v Alstom UK [2017] EWHC 1748 (QB) (10 July 2017)
On the balance of probabilities, AEI was the employer of Mr Critchley, as supported by documentary evidence, admissions, and the structure and accounts of the companies. Even if AEIM was nominally the employer, it acted only as agent for AEI. Therefore, AEI was liable to Mr Critchley, and Alstom is liable to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1748
- Parties
- Claimant: The English Electric Company Limited; Defendant: Alstom UK
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Indemnity Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity, Corporate Restructuring, Employer Liability, Agency
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The English Electric Company Limited
Claimant
Alstom UK
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Indemnity Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether AEI was the employer of Mr Critchley for the purposes of liability and indemnity
- 2 Whether Alstom is liable to indemnify EE under the Alstom Indemnity
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, AEI was the employer of Mr Critchley, as supported by documentary evidence, admissions, and the structure and accounts of the companies. Even if AEIM was nominally the employer, it acted only as agent for AEI. Therefore, AEI was liable to Mr Critchley, and Alstom is liable to indemnify EE under the Alstom Indemnity.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Alstom is liable to indemnify EE under the Alstom Indemnity for the amount paid by EE to AEI in respect of Mr Critchley's claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment