Altan Goksu v The Commissioners for HMRC
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the appellant's accountant notified HMRC of the capital loss in 2000 in a quantified manner, entitling the appellant to deduct a minimum loss of £412,126. The overstatement of expenses in the 2014-15 return was found to be careless, not deliberate, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Altan Goksu; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Capital Gains Tax, Notification of Capital Loss, Penalties for Inaccuracies, Burden of Proof, Time Limits for Claims
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Altan Goksu
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant notified HMRC of a capital loss from 1998 within the statutory time limit and in a quantified manner
- 2 Whether the inclusion of the loss and certain expenses in the 2014-15 tax return was careless or deliberate, justifying penalties
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the appellant's accountant notified HMRC of the capital loss in 2000 in a quantified manner, entitling the appellant to deduct a minimum loss of £412,126. The overstatement of expenses in the 2014-15 return was found to be careless, not deliberate, and the penalty was reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The closure notice amending the 2014-15 tax return and the related penalty for careless inaccuracy is set aside.
- The penalty for overstatement of expenses is confirmed in the amount of £6,627.03.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment