Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. & Anor v Alvotech HF & Anor
A valid SPC export waiver notification does not require the marketing authorisation reference number for the export country to be included at the time of notification. The statutory language and legislative purpose, as reflected in Article 5(5)(e) and Recital 17, permit the notification to be made before the MA is granted, with the obligation to update the notification once the MA number is publicly available. The Claimants' interpretation would undermine the level playing field objective and is not supported by the text or purpose of the Regulation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Claimant: Bayer PLC; Defendant: Alvotech HF; Defendant: Fisher Clinical Services UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Patent/intellectual Property / Judgment After Expedited Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Supplementary Protection Certificate (spc), SPC Manufacturing Waiver, Patent Infringement, Biosimilars, Notification Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Claimant
Bayer PLC
Claimant
Alvotech HF
Defendant
Fisher Clinical Services UK Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent/intellectual Property / Judgment After Expedited Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid SPC export waiver notification requires the marketing authorisation (MA) reference number for the export country to be included at the time of notification
- 2 Whether the absence of an MA number at the time of notification invalidates the waiver and exposes the manufacturer to infringement
- 3 Whether the SPC owner is entitled to injunctive relief if the notification is invalid
Ratio Decidendi
A valid SPC export waiver notification does not require the marketing authorisation reference number for the export country to be included at the time of notification. The statutory language and legislative purpose, as reflected in Article 5(5)(e) and Recital 17, permit the notification to be made before the MA is granted, with the obligation to update the notification once the MA number is publicly available. The Claimants' interpretation would undermine the level playing field objective and is not supported by the text or purpose of the Regulation.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimants' claim to an injunction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment