AM v SS
The wife cannot reasonably obtain legal services without an order, and the only asset safely available is the equity in the Maida Vale Property. To ensure equal footing and access to justice, the husband is ordered to provide a charge over the Maida Vale Property for the wife’s legal costs, limited to £150,000.
- Parties
- Applicant: AM; Respondent: SS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Legal Services Order in Financial Remedy Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Legal Services Order granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Legal Services Order, Maintenance Pending Suit, Financial Remedies, Costs in Matrimonial Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AM
Applicant
SS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Legal Services Order in Financial Remedy Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant wife is entitled to a Legal Services Order for legal costs
- 2 Whether the respondent husband has resources to meet such an order
- 3 Appropriate quantum and form of any Legal Services Order
Ratio Decidendi
The wife cannot reasonably obtain legal services without an order, and the only asset safely available is the equity in the Maida Vale Property. To ensure equal footing and access to justice, the husband is ordered to provide a charge over the Maida Vale Property for the wife’s legal costs, limited to £150,000.
Court Disposition
Legal Services Order granted in part
Orders
- Husband to provide wife a charge over Maida Vale Property for £150,000 (£100,000 for future costs, £50,000 for costs incurred to date)
- Husband not to increase mortgage to RBS or dispose of interest in Maida Vale Property
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment