Amanda Barrow v The Information Commissioner
The Commissioner complied with procedural requirements under section 166(1) DPA 2018 by providing an outcome and updates; the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of the complaint, and there is no reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding.
- Parties
- Appellant: Amanda Barrow; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Strike Out Decision
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Requirements Under Data Protection Act 2018, Section 166 DPA Applications, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Commissioner's Investigation Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amanda Barrow
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Strike Out Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commissioner failed to comply with procedural requirements under section 166(1) of the Data Protection Act 2018
- 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to order a substantive investigation into the merits of the complaint
Ratio Decidendi
The Commissioner complied with procedural requirements under section 166(1) DPA 2018 by providing an outcome and updates; the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of the complaint, and there is no reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 because there is no reasonable prospect of the Applicant’s case, or part of it, succeeding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment