Amanda Louise Staveley v Victor Restis
The application to set aside the statutory demand is dismissed because the 2016 Deed and its arbitration clause were superseded by subsequent agreements, including the 7 January 2021 agreement and the promissory note, both of which imposed clear personal liability on Ms Staveley. There is no credible evidence of duress, undue influence, or actionable misrepresentation. The only extant part of the demand is the principal loan amount, which is undisputed and enforceable. Claims for legal fees and interest are not pursued.
- Parties
- Applicant: Amanda Louise Staveley; Respondent: Victor Restis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed as to the principal loan; statutory demand set aside as to legal fees and interest; permission to present bankruptcy petition granted after 21 days.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Promissory Note, Duress, Undue Influence, Misrepresentation, Entire Agreement Clause, Arbitration Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amanda Louise Staveley
Applicant
Victor Restis
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand should be set aside on grounds of substantial dispute, duress, undue influence, or misrepresentation
- 2 Whether the dispute should be referred to arbitration under the 2016 Deed
- 3 Whether Ms Staveley is personally liable under the relevant agreements and promissory note
Ratio Decidendi
The application to set aside the statutory demand is dismissed because the 2016 Deed and its arbitration clause were superseded by subsequent agreements, including the 7 January 2021 agreement and the promissory note, both of which imposed clear personal liability on Ms Staveley. There is no credible evidence of duress, undue influence, or actionable misrepresentation. The only extant part of the demand is the principal loan amount, which is undisputed and enforceable. Claims for legal fees and interest are not pursued.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside statutory demand dismissed as to the principal loan; statutory demand set aside as to legal fees and interest; permission to present bankruptcy petition granted after 21 days.
Orders
- Statutory demand set aside as to legal fees and interest.
- Statutory demand upheld as to principal loan amount of £3,477,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment