Amar Hayat v The Information Commissioner

Amar Hayat v The Information Commissioner

The Respondent complied with all procedural requirements under section 166 of the DPA 2018, and the appeal has no reasonable prospect of success.

Parties
Appellant: Amar Hayat; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Striking Out of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Procedural Compliance, Section 166 DPA 2018, General Data Protection Regulation, Tribunal Procedure
Data Protection Information Rights Procedural Compliance Section 166 DPA 2018 General Data Protection Regulation Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amar Hayat

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Striking Out of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent failed to comply with procedural requirements under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018
  2. 2 Whether the appeal has a reasonable prospect of success

Ratio Decidendi

The Respondent complied with all procedural requirements under section 166 of the DPA 2018, and the appeal has no reasonable prospect of success.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.