Ambrosiadou v Coward
The court declined to clarify or amplify the scope of permission to appeal, holding that the matters raised are either already encompassed within the existing permission or are not appropriate for determination at this stage. The distinction between personal and business information is a matter for the substantive appeal or any consequential order, not for preliminary determination.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ambrosiadou; Respondent: Coward
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Clarification or Amplification of Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- No order made
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Confidential Information, Article 8 ECHR, Appeal Permission Scope
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ambrosiadou
Applicant
Coward
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Clarification or Amplification of Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the scope of permission to appeal should be clarified or amplified to include additional grounds relating to publication of confidential information
- 2 Whether business affairs intertwined with matrimonial proceedings attract Article 8 protection
- 3 Whether reliance on counsel's assurance is sufficient to protect the child's privacy
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to clarify or amplify the scope of permission to appeal, holding that the matters raised are either already encompassed within the existing permission or are not appropriate for determination at this stage. The distinction between personal and business information is a matter for the substantive appeal or any consequential order, not for preliminary determination.
Court Disposition
No order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment