AMC III Purple BV v Amethyst Radiotherapy Ltd
The contractual documents (MFA and SLA) clearly stipulate payment obligations and preclude set-off; Defendant's non-payment constitutes Events of Default. No valid defence exists to summary judgment. Arbitration and refinancing arguments do not bar enforcement or judgment.
- Parties
- Claimant: AMC III Purple B. V.; Defendant: Amethyst Radiotherapy Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in favour of Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Loan Agreements, Events of Default, Set Off, Jurisdiction Clauses, Stay of Proceedings, Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AMC III Purple B. V.
Claimant
Amethyst Radiotherapy Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Events of Default occurred under the MFA and SLA
- 2 Whether the Defendant is entitled to set-off against sums due under the MFA and SLA
- 3 Whether the SLA is subordinated to the MFA
Ratio Decidendi
The contractual documents (MFA and SLA) clearly stipulate payment obligations and preclude set-off; Defendant's non-payment constitutes Events of Default. No valid defence exists to summary judgment. Arbitration and refinancing arguments do not bar enforcement or judgment.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in favour of Claimant
Orders
- Declaration that Events of Default occurred under MFA and SLA
- Order for payment of outstanding interest under MFA (€296,407.07)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment