Teva Pharma BV & Anor v Amgen, Inc & Anor
It is desirable for Amgen, Inc. to remain a party because Teva has a real prospect of successfully claiming declaratory relief against it, Amgen, Inc. may be affected by the court’s determination, and its tactical assignment of the patent raises legitimate concerns about future actions and binding effect of the court’s rulings.
- Parties
- Claimant: Teva Pharma BV; Claimant: Teva UK Limited; Defendant: Amgen, Inc.; Defendant: Amgen Manufacturing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Revocation and Declaratory Relief / Ruling on Application to Remove Party
- Outcome
- Application to remove Amgen, Inc. as a party dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Revocation, Supplementary Protection Certificate, Declaratory Relief, Party Joinder and Removal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teva Pharma BV
Claimant
Teva UK Limited
Claimant
Amgen, Inc.
Defendant
Amgen Manufacturing Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation and Declaratory Relief / Ruling on Application to Remove Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is desirable under CPR rule 19.2(3) for Amgen, Inc. to cease to be a party to three claims relating to European Patent (UK) No. 2 345 724
Ratio Decidendi
It is desirable for Amgen, Inc. to remain a party because Teva has a real prospect of successfully claiming declaratory relief against it, Amgen, Inc. may be affected by the court’s determination, and its tactical assignment of the patent raises legitimate concerns about future actions and binding effect of the court’s rulings.
Court Disposition
Application to remove Amgen, Inc. as a party dismissed.
Orders
- Amgen, Inc. remains a party to all three claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment