Amicus Finance Plc, Re (Convening judgment) [2021] EWHC 2255 (Ch) (09 August 2021)
The court held that the threshold conditions for proposing a restructuring plan under Part 26A Companies Act 2006 were satisfied, as Amicus was cashflow insolvent and the plan was intended to address its financial difficulties. The proposed class composition was not appropriate as originally drafted; instead, Crowdstacker and HGTL Securitisation should form a single class for their senior secured claims up to the value of Crowdstacker's debt, with HGTL Securitisation's junior debt forming a separate class. The explanatory statement, as amended, was sufficient to enable creditors to make an informed decision. The court ordered the convening of creditor meetings in accordance with the...
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2255 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: Amicus Finance plc (in administration); Respondent/objector: Crowdstacker Corporate Services Limited; Supporting Creditor: HGTL Securitisation Company Limited and the Hartford Entities
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency/restructuring Plan Application / Convening Hearing for Creditor Meetings Under Part 26 a Companies Act 2006
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Restructuring Plan, Class Composition, Creditor Meetings, Administration, Liquidation Alternative, Notice Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amicus Finance plc (in administration)
Applicant
Crowdstacker Corporate Services Limited
Respondent/objector
HGTL Securitisation Company Limited and the Hartford Entities
Supporting Creditor
Procedural Posture
Insolvency/restructuring Plan Application / Convening Hearing for Creditor Meetings Under Part 26 a Companies Act 2006
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to convene meetings of creditors for approval of a restructuring plan under Part 26A Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the proposed classes of creditors for voting are appropriate
- 3 Whether the explanatory statement and plan documentation are adequate
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the threshold conditions for proposing a restructuring plan under Part 26A Companies Act 2006 were satisfied, as Amicus was cashflow insolvent and the plan was intended to address its financial difficulties. The proposed class composition was not appropriate as originally drafted; instead, Crowdstacker and HGTL Securitisation should form a single class for their senior secured claims up to the value of Crowdstacker's debt, with HGTL Securitisation's junior debt forming a separate class. The explanatory statement, as amended, was sufficient to enable creditors to make an informed decision. The court ordered the convening of creditor meetings in accordance with the...
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Order convening meetings of creditors in accordance with revised class structure: (1) Expense Creditors (excluding Hartford Growth), (2) Preferential Creditors, (3) Unsecured Creditors, (4) Secured Creditors (Crowdstacker and HGTL Securitisation up to Crowdstacker's debt), (5) Secured Creditors (HGTL Securitisation...
- Directions for service and notice as set out in the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment