Amicus Horizon Ltd v Thorley [2012] EWCA Civ 817 (30 May 2012)
The original four-month imprisonment sentence was excessive given the conduct was at the lower end of the relevant category under the Sentencing Guidelines; a total sentence of six weeks' imprisonment, with sentences for each breach to run concurrently, was appropriate.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 817
- Parties
- Appellant: Amicus Horizon Ltd; Respondent: Thorley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Antisocial Behaviour Injunction, Breach of Injunction, Possession Proceedings, Sentencing Guidelines
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amicus Horizon Ltd
Appellant
Thorley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for breaches of antisocial behaviour injunction was excessive
- 2 Appropriate application of Sentencing Guidelines Council recommendations in civil committal proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The original four-month imprisonment sentence was excessive given the conduct was at the lower end of the relevant category under the Sentencing Guidelines; a total sentence of six weeks' imprisonment, with sentences for each breach to run concurrently, was appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Total sentence reduced to six weeks' imprisonment, sentences for each breach to run concurrently from date of re-arrest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment