R v Amir Mir

R v Amir Mir

The sentence imposed, including the upward adjustment for totality, was justified given the sophistication, scale, and duration of the offending, and was not manifestly excessive.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Amir Mir
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 July 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Conspiracy, Drug Offences, Money Laundering, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Sentencing Conspiracy Drug Offences Money Laundering Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Amir Mir

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the upward adjustment of the sentence imposed on count 1 to account for offending in counts 2 and 4 was excessive under the totality principle

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed, including the upward adjustment for totality, was justified given the sophistication, scale, and duration of the offending, and was not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The custodial sentence of 12 years' imprisonment is upheld.