Al-Ameri v Kensington & Chelsea
Residence in accommodation allocated under the NASS dispersal scheme is not residence of the applicant's own choice for the purposes of s199(1)(a) of the Housing Act 1996, because the statutory scheme requires the provider to ignore any preference of the asylum seeker as to locality. Therefore, such residence cannot give rise to a local connection under that provision.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ammar Al-Ameri; Respondent: Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea; Appellant: Maria Osmani; Respondent: London Borough of Harrow; Intervener: Glasgow City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed (by majority)
- Legal Topics
- Local Connection Under Homelessness Legislation, Asylum Seeker Accommodation, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ammar Al-Ameri
Appellant
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
Respondent
Maria Osmani
Appellant
London Borough of Harrow
Respondent
Glasgow City Council
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether residence in accommodation allocated under the NASS dispersal scheme can give rise to a local connection under s199(1)(a) of the Housing Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
Residence in accommodation allocated under the NASS dispersal scheme is not residence of the applicant's own choice for the purposes of s199(1)(a) of the Housing Act 1996, because the statutory scheme requires the provider to ignore any preference of the asylum seeker as to locality. Therefore, such residence cannot give rise to a local connection under that provision.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed (by majority)
Orders
- Decisions of the lower courts are set aside; the appellants are not to be regarded as having a local connection with Glasgow City Council under s199(1)(a) of the Housing Act 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment