AMS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PC)

AMS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PC)

Where an EEA national with prior self-sufficiency and comprehensive sickness insurance claims state pension credit, Brey and Directive 2004/38/EC require an individualised assessment of whether granting the benefit would impose an unreasonable burden on the UK's social assistance system, considering personal circumstances and collective impact; neither the DWP nor the First-tier Tribunal conducted such an assessment, constituting an error of law.

Parties
Appellant: AMS; Respondent: SSWP (PC)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Administrative Appeal / Second Interim Decision
Outcome
First-tier Tribunal decision set aside; directions issued for further evidence and submissions to enable Brey-style assessment before remaking the decision.
Legal Topics
Right to Reside, State Pension Credit, Directive 2004/38/ec, Comprehensive Sickness Insurance, Sufficient Resources, Unreasonable Burden, Proportionality, Individual Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AMS

Appellant

SSWP (PC)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Appeal / Second Interim Decision

  1. 1 Does Brey require an individualised assessment of whether granting state pension credit would impose an unreasonable burden on the UK's social assistance system for an EEA national with prior self-sufficiency and comprehensive sickness insurance?
  2. 2 Has the DWP and First-tier Tribunal failed to conduct the assessment mandated by Brey and Article 7(1)(b) and 8(4) of Directive 2004/38/EC?

Ratio Decidendi

Where an EEA national with prior self-sufficiency and comprehensive sickness insurance claims state pension credit, Brey and Directive 2004/38/EC require an individualised assessment of whether granting the benefit would impose an unreasonable burden on the UK's social assistance system, considering personal circumstances and collective impact; neither the DWP nor the First-tier Tribunal conducted such an assessment, constituting an error of law.

Court Disposition

First-tier Tribunal decision set aside; directions issued for further evidence and submissions to enable Brey-style assessment before remaking the decision.

Orders

  • Appellant to file and serve further evidence within 21 days.
  • Respondent to file and serve further evidence within 21 days of appellant's evidence.