Amy Boudewijn v Ashley Paul Johnson & Anor
The court was satisfied, primarily on the basis of DNA evidence showing a 99.9375% probability of half-sibling relationship, and corroborating documentary and testimonial evidence, that Errol Washington Johnson was the biological father of Amy Boudewijn. There was no public policy reason to refuse the declaration.
- Parties
- Applicant: Amy Boudewijn; First Respondent: Ashley Paul Johnson (as Representative of the Estate of Errol Washington Johnson); Second Respondent: Bridget Sumpter Boudewijn
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Declaration of Parentage / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Parentage, Jurisdiction Under Family Law Act 1986, Amendment of Birth Certificate, DNA Evidence, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amy Boudewijn
Applicant
Ashley Paul Johnson (as Representative of the Estate of Errol Washington Johnson)
First Respondent
Bridget Sumpter Boudewijn
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Declaration of Parentage / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Errol Washington Johnson was the biological father of Amy Boudewijn
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to make a declaration of parentage
- 3 Whether the declaration should be made based on the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied, primarily on the basis of DNA evidence showing a 99.9375% probability of half-sibling relationship, and corroborating documentary and testimonial evidence, that Errol Washington Johnson was the biological father of Amy Boudewijn. There was no public policy reason to refuse the declaration.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted
Orders
- It is declared that Errol Washington Johnson was the parent of Amy Boudewijn.
- A court officer shall send a copy of the order and application to the Registrar General for Births and Deaths within 21 days for consideration of re-registration of Amy's birth under the Births and Deaths Registration Act 1953, section 14A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment