AN v St Andrew’s Healthcare & Anor
The tribunal’s provisional finding that AN did not have a mental disorder did not render his detention unlawful; the tribunal retains power to revisit its finding on mental state at the reconvened hearing before making a final discharge decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: AN; First Respondent: St Andrew’s Healthcare; Second Respondent: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From First Tier Tribunal (health, Education and Social Care Chamber) / Upper Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; no error of law in First-tier Tribunal decision.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Discharge, Mental Disorder, Unlawful Detention, Tribunal Powers, Article 5 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AN
Appellant
St Andrew’s Healthcare
First Respondent
Secretary of State for Justice
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From First Tier Tribunal (health, Education and Social Care Chamber) / Upper Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the patient was being unlawfully detained after a provisional finding of no mental disorder
- 2 Whether the tribunal could revisit its finding on the patient's mental state before making a final decision
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal’s provisional finding that AN did not have a mental disorder did not render his detention unlawful; the tribunal retains power to revisit its finding on mental state at the reconvened hearing before making a final discharge decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; no error of law in First-tier Tribunal decision.
Orders
- The tribunal retains its full powers at any reconvened hearing.
- No direction to reconvene issued; parties to file further position statements by 9 March 2026.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment