The Law Society of England And Wales v Sheikh [2018] EWHC 1644 (QB) (07 June 2018)
The Defendant's claims in the Employment Tribunal are frivolous, vexatious, abusive, and totally without merit, constituting an attempt to circumvent prior General Civil Restraint Orders. The court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and injunctive relief restraining further vexatious litigation.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 1644 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Law Society of England and Wales; Defendant: Anal Sheikh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (part 8 Claim) / Final Judgment on Application for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Civil Restraint Orders, Vexatious Litigation, Injunctive Relief, Employment Tribunal Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Law Society of England and Wales
Claimant
Anal Sheikh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (part 8 Claim) / Final Judgment on Application for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant's Employment Tribunal claims are totally without merit
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to restrain vexatious litigation in inferior tribunals
- 3 Whether mandatory and prohibitory injunctive relief should be granted against the Defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant's claims in the Employment Tribunal are frivolous, vexatious, abusive, and totally without merit, constituting an attempt to circumvent prior General Civil Restraint Orders. The court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory and injunctive relief restraining further vexatious litigation.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Declaration that Defendant's Employment Tribunal claims are totally without merit
- Mandatory injunction requiring Defendant to apply for withdrawal and dismissal of current Employment Tribunal claims
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment